objectRegistry can leak memory
As discussed with @Mattijs - since all HashTable operations are visible through objectRegistry, anything that removes entries using the HashTable methods can leak memory if the object is owned by the registry.
Site will likely be offline for maintenance 23/24 April - more details soon
As discussed with @Mattijs - since all HashTable operations are visible through objectRegistry, anything that removes entries using the HashTable methods can leak memory if the object is owned by the registry.
No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down this issue into smaller parts.
Link issues together to show that they're related. Learn more.
mentioned in commit 47493f50f1f03ce26a097624350bedfdf89d7edc
@andy - related to EP829 (will speak tomorrow)
odd-looking use of store()
in basicThermo
mentioned in commit 1dea317a1059b50b8473cbb488174b97e78d3f2f
mentioned in commit 91bf628882c313032526fe3b5965d4501fc43ddb
Instead of checkOutByName() or equivalent, just corrected the handling of erase()
to ensure that it doesn't leak memory. This provides the same functionality with an existing method name and plugs potential memory leaks.
mentioned in commit cb0a2636de46004feb26c419be0602c0520842be
mentioned in issue #613 (closed)
assuming resolved considering the commits above.
please open a new ticket if the issue persists.
closed