dictionary deprecation mechanism quite verbose
I am getting (e.g. smallPoolFire2D tutorial)
keyword is deemed to be 5 months old
on all processors. One should be enough.
Site will likely be offline for maintenance 23/24 April - more details soon
I am getting (e.g. smallPoolFire2D tutorial)
keyword is deemed to be 5 months old
on all processors. One should be enough.
No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down this issue into smaller parts.
Link issues together to show that they're related. Learn more.
Yes, makes sense. I used std::cerr
instead of Info
, since this could fail while reading any dictionary.
Explicitly check UPstream::parRun?
I actually thought of Pstream::master()
but just wanted to provide a quick explanation for why you are seeing so many complaints.
What do you think about the same treatment for the following as well?
They are all places where we use a std::cerr
instead of a Warning
, since we need it to work before everything is constructed, but where we'd have happily had Warning
with output on the master only.
Sure but is there an initialisation order problem?
myProcNo_[communicator] == masterNo();
myProcNo_ gets sized after e.g. etc/controlDict reading?
mentioned in commit 9f5a16357f0b6d90d070a3b5aac7d6a05050e0b1
closed
mentioned in issue #893 (closed)