... | ... | @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ Key reasons for using the lid-driven cavity (referred to as "cavity" in the foll |
|
|
|
|
|
* The test case chosen is the 3-D version of the [Lid-driven cavity flow tutorial](https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/tutorial-guide/tutorialse2.php).
|
|
|
* The cavity is one of the most basic and popular cases in OpenFOAM and for the validation in CFD codes
|
|
|
* This test case has simple geometry and boundary conditions, involving transient, isothermal, incompressible laminar flow in a three-dimensional box domain. The _icoFoam_ solver is used in such test-case.
|
|
|
* The _icoFoam_ solver is used in such test-case.
|
|
|
* This test case has simple geometry and boundary conditions, involving transient, isothermal, incompressible laminar flow in a three-dimensional box domain.
|
|
|
* It is intended to stress test the linear algebra solver, most of the time being spent in the pressure equation.
|
|
|
* Results for scaling are available at the white paper \[[1](https://develop.openfoam.com/committees/hpc/-/wikis/home#references)\].
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ The first test case chosen is the 3-D version of the [Lid-driven cavity flow tut |
|
|
This test case has simple geometry and boundary conditions, involving transient, isothermal, incompressible laminar flow in a three-dimensional box domain. The _icoFoam_ solver is used in such test-case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is intended to stress test the linear algebra solver, most of the time being spent in the pressure equation.
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**_Definition of geometrical and physical properties_**
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -111,6 +112,8 @@ ln -s fvSolution.<Method>.fixedITER fvSolution |
|
|
|
|
|
This figure shows the total time for solving PISO with different preconditioner/solver pairs reported in the Table above, for the XL test-case, with fixed exit norm configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3D Lid-driven cavity micro-benchmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. credits to @Serge.
|
... | ... | |