... | ... | @@ -14,9 +14,7 @@ Insert a table with a description of test cases?? |
|
|
|
|
|
## 3-D Lid Driven cavity flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
_Why cavity?_
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key reasons for using the lid-driven cavity (referred to as "cavity" in the following) as a (micro)-benchmark are:
|
|
|
_Why cavity?_ Key reasons for using the lid-driven cavity (referred to as "cavity" in the following) as a (micro)-benchmark are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The test case chosen is the 3-D version of the [Lid-driven cavity flow tutorial](https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/tutorial-guide/tutorialse2.php).
|
|
|
* The cavity is one of the most basic and popular cases in OpenFOAM and for the validation in CFD codes.
|
... | ... | @@ -34,8 +32,6 @@ Key reasons for using the lid-driven cavity (referred to as "cavity" in the foll |
|
|
|
|
|
</summary>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this simple geometry, all the boundaries of the box are walls. The top wall moves in the x-direction at the speed of 1 m/s while the other five are stationary. Three different sizes have been selected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Small (S)
|
... | ... | @@ -61,6 +57,8 @@ The following table shows the geometrical and physical properties of the differe |
|
|
|
|
|
The test-case XL is used with a number of iterations equal to 100 to reduce the computational time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
**_Set-up of linear algebra solvers_**
|
|
|
|
|
|
The setup for the linear algebra solvers comprises the following:Pressure:
|
... | ... | @@ -104,7 +102,7 @@ ln -s fvSolution.<Method>.fixedITER fvSolution |
|
|
![Figure](Lid_driven_cavity-3d/assets/time_3d.png "total time for PISO solver, XL Test case")
|
|
|
|
|
|
This figure shows the total time for solving PISO with different preconditioner/solver pairs reported in the Table above, for the XL test-case, with fixed exit norm configuration.
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3D Lid-driven cavity micro-benchmark
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |