Development issueshttps://develop.openfoam.com/groups/Development/-/issues2016-05-06T11:56:35Zhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/53MD2014: feature request: placeholder2016-05-06T11:56:35ZPrashant SonakarMD2014: feature request: placeholderPlaceholder for feature requested on exchange platform: ID 90
Definition by sampledSurface for fluxSummary
@MattijsPlaceholder for feature requested on exchange platform: ID 90
Definition by sampledSurface for fluxSummary
@MattijsAdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/117Feature Request: residuals from the matrix solver direcly via the solverPerfo...2016-05-06T12:06:12ZPrashant SonakarFeature Request: residuals from the matrix solver direcly via the solverPerformance libe.g. momentum residual
@Sergio @mark @Mattijs e.g. momentum residual
@Sergio @mark @Mattijs AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/75ENH : redistributePar to work with sets2016-05-06T12:18:02ZPrashant SonakarENH : redistributePar to work with setsPlaceholder for future development.
The sets written by SHM or checkMesh don't get distributed with redistributePar.
This leads to failure for utilities accessing sets. e.g. renumberMesh
@andy Placeholder for future development.
The sets written by SHM or checkMesh don't get distributed with redistributePar.
This leads to failure for utilities accessing sets. e.g. renumberMesh
@andy Mattijs Janssens4-Mattijs@users.noreply.develop.openfoam.comMattijs Janssens4-Mattijs@users.noreply.develop.openfoam.comhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/63BUG: Missing integration to $FOAM_SRC/fvOptions/corrections2016-05-10T13:33:19ZPrashant SonakarBUG: Missing integration to $FOAM_SRC/fvOptions/correctionsFrom @Koushik
The "corrections" folder from $FOAM_SRC/fvOptions seem to be missing in Make/files
@Mattijs @Sergio From @Koushik
The "corrections" folder from $FOAM_SRC/fvOptions seem to be missing in Make/files
@Mattijs @Sergio AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/70BUG: applyBoundaryLayer - with IDDES- SA model2016-05-10T13:33:20ZPrashant SonakarBUG: applyBoundaryLayer - with IDDES- SA modelThe applyBoundaryLayer failed on motorBike case attached.
[log.applyBoundaryLayer](/uploads/66170ee700432be3e266f2c51602b669/log.applyBoundaryLayer)
[motorBike-les-applyBL.tgz](/uploads/585ee00c570a44654e1883437001a56c/motorBike-...The applyBoundaryLayer failed on motorBike case attached.
[log.applyBoundaryLayer](/uploads/66170ee700432be3e266f2c51602b669/log.applyBoundaryLayer)
[motorBike-les-applyBL.tgz](/uploads/585ee00c570a44654e1883437001a56c/motorBike-les-applyBL.tgz)
@Sergio @Mattijs AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/94BUG: Missing "residuals" FO utility in Make/file2016-05-10T13:33:21ZPrashant SonakarBUG: Missing "residuals" FO utility in Make/fileThe residuals FO from src/postProcessing/functionObjects/utilities/residuals is missing in Make/file
@andy The residuals FO from src/postProcessing/functionObjects/utilities/residuals is missing in Make/file
@andy Sergio FerrarisSergio Ferrarishttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/92BUG: foamToEnsight failed with epsilon field from applyBL2016-05-30T06:01:01ZPrashant SonakarBUG: foamToEnsight failed with epsilon field from applyBLAttached case replicating the behavior with new applyBoundaryLayer code from 92ae4fbe
Should the fields be written only corresponding to turbulence model being used?
[case_ofplus_foamToEnsight_failure.tgz](/uploads/dccead1228870cbd...Attached case replicating the behavior with new applyBoundaryLayer code from 92ae4fbe
Should the fields be written only corresponding to turbulence model being used?
[case_ofplus_foamToEnsight_failure.tgz](/uploads/dccead1228870cbdb91a557de5c6fe9f/case_ofplus_foamToEnsight_failure.tgz)
@Sergio AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/133error in SGS epsilon in dynamic K equation model OF3.0.x-Parallel simulation2016-06-02T06:09:09ZAdminerror in SGS epsilon in dynamic K equation model OF3.0.x-Parallel simulationWhen running in parallel, with dynamic 1 equation eddy model, the epsilon at the cells that are boundaries of processors are strange. For example at the inner cell epsilonSGS is 1e5 however at the boundaries is 1e-5!
Interesting is tha...When running in parallel, with dynamic 1 equation eddy model, the epsilon at the cells that are boundaries of processors are strange. For example at the inner cell epsilonSGS is 1e5 however at the boundaries is 1e-5!
Interesting is that when looking at the epsilonSGS which is evaluated by the constant Ce equals to 1.048, there is no problem.Sergio FerrarisSergio Ferrarishttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/137BUG: incorrect switch output for 'prime2Mean' in fieldAverage function obj2016-06-02T13:02:11ZMark OLESENBUG: incorrect switch output for 'prime2Mean' in fieldAverage function objIncorrect variable referenced in output of "prime2Mean" switch setting.Incorrect variable referenced in output of "prime2Mean" switch setting.https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/134UOPstream indexes out of bounds for non-white character filtering2016-06-02T13:02:27ZMattijs Janssens4-Mattijs@users.noreply.develop.openfoam.comUOPstream indexes out of bounds for non-white character filteringFrom code inspection it seems as if the non-white character filtering in C-style string writing indexes out of bounds.From code inspection it seems as if the non-white character filtering in C-style string writing indexes out of bounds.Mark OLESENMark OLESENhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/136installation on ubuntu - flex version2016-06-06T10:17:11ZMatej Formaninstallation on ubuntu - flex versionOpenFOAM is checking for older version of flex then installed by default in Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 is using flex version 2.6.0-11
There is a solution https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Installation/Linux/OpenFOAM-3.0.1/Ubuntu
Step 10...OpenFOAM is checking for older version of flex then installed by default in Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 is using flex version 2.6.0-11
There is a solution https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Installation/Linux/OpenFOAM-3.0.1/Ubuntu
Step 10.
We should either add this step to the build guide: http://openfoam.com/code/build-guide.php
or suggest users to install flex-old package with version 2.5.4
Or do the changes in the source code for successful compilation.
AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/107BUG: Erroneous output/crash for forceCoeffs and forceCoeffBins using *Mean va...2016-06-10T15:06:02ZPrashant SonakarBUG: Erroneous output/crash for forceCoeffs and forceCoeffBins using *Mean valuesWhen averaging of the field is activated at later time in simulation, using them for forces FO can lead to failure.
- using evaluateControl is one solution
But when no information is provided, it produces
- erroneous output for fo...When averaging of the field is activated at later time in simulation, using them for forces FO can lead to failure.
- using evaluateControl is one solution
But when no information is provided, it produces
- erroneous output for forceCoeffs
- crash when using forceCoeffsBin
[motorBike_forceCoeff-withMeanValues.tgz](/uploads/09f689a12196bf17a9e3bb6ee754ab78/motorBike_forceCoeff-withMeanValues.tgz)
AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/98Error while trying to compile the SP version of openFoam v3.0+2016-06-10T15:06:03ZAdminError while trying to compile the SP version of openFoam v3.0+The DP version of the code compiles fine.
When the SP flag is used the compiler throws the following :
In file included from ../turbulenceModels/lnInclude/SpalartAllmarasDES.H:241:0,
from turbulentTransportModels/...The DP version of the code compiles fine.
When the SP flag is used the compiler throws the following :
In file included from ../turbulenceModels/lnInclude/SpalartAllmarasDES.H:241:0,
from turbulentTransportModels/turbulentTransportModels.C:112:
../turbulenceModels/lnInclude/SpalartAllmarasDES.C: In member function 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> > Foam::LESModels::SpalartAllmarasDES<BasicTurbulenceModel>::psi(const volScalarField&, const volScalarField&) const':
../turbulenceModels/lnInclude/SpalartAllmarasDES.C:189:55: error: no matching function for call to 'max(double, Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >&)'
../turbulenceModels/lnInclude/SpalartAllmarasDES.C:189:55: note: candidates are:
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:59:1: note: int8_t Foam::max(int8_t, int8_t)
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:59:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >' to 'int8_t {aka signed char}'
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:60:1: note: int16_t Foam::max(int16_t, int16_t)
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:60:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >' to 'int16_t {aka short int}'
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:62:1: note: int32_t Foam::max(int32_t, int32_t)
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:62:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >' to 'int32_t {aka int}'
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:63:1: note: int64_t Foam::max(int64_t, int32_t)
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:63:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >' to 'int32_t {aka int}'
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:64:1: note: int64_t Foam::max(int32_t, int64_t)
/scratch/Apps/OF/OpenFOAM-v3.0+/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/int.H:64:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'Foam::tmp<Foam::GeometricField<float, Foam::fvPatchField, Foam::volMesh> >' to 'int64_t {aka long int}'
It has also been tried to compile it with a single cpu but the error is the same.
Thank you
Pawan GhildiyalPawan Ghildiyalhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/37foamHelp does not use 'application' setting in controlDict2016-06-10T15:06:03ZMattijs Janssens4-Mattijs@users.noreply.develop.openfoam.comfoamHelp does not use 'application' setting in controlDict'foamHelp solver' should pick up solver from application setting.'foamHelp solver' should pick up solver from application setting.https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/139Compiler error in activePressureForceBaffleVelocityFvPatchVectorField.C2016-06-13T08:30:35ZAdminCompiler error in activePressureForceBaffleVelocityFvPatchVectorField.CWrong assignment in activePressureForceBaffleVelocityFvPatchVectorField.C:283:23
Division of scalar and scalarFieldWrong assignment in activePressureForceBaffleVelocityFvPatchVectorField.C:283:23
Division of scalar and scalarFieldSergio FerrarisSergio Ferrarishttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/124BUG: inconsistent argument specification- surface* utilities2016-06-13T12:19:12ZPrashant SonakarBUG: inconsistent argument specification- surface* utilitiesThe input argument specification, specifically triSurface geometry is inconsistent
```
surfaceAdd constant/triSurface/a.stl constant/triSurface/b.stl
surfaceBooleanFeatures union a.stl b.stl
```
@Mattijs The input argument specification, specifically triSurface geometry is inconsistent
```
surfaceAdd constant/triSurface/a.stl constant/triSurface/b.stl
surfaceBooleanFeatures union a.stl b.stl
```
@Mattijs AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/116coupled edge synchronisation on cyclic baffles2016-06-13T13:40:18ZMattijs Janssens4-Mattijs@users.noreply.develop.openfoam.comcoupled edge synchronisation on cyclic bafflesCoupled edge handling was not correct for cyclic baffles. This gives some obscure error message about not being able to find transform.
This is solved in Foundation dev 001e172fed1d4ef231fce4f6f94439df86bb0fcf. If it doesn't give any...Coupled edge handling was not correct for cyclic baffles. This gives some obscure error message about not being able to find transform.
This is solved in Foundation dev 001e172fed1d4ef231fce4f6f94439df86bb0fcf. If it doesn't give any problems we might want to merge this in early (i.e. before the next big re-sync)
https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/131ENH: runTimePostProcessing text output with 'timeStamp'2016-06-14T07:50:33ZPrashant SonakarENH: runTimePostProcessing text output with 'timeStamp'It would be good to have time stamp on images to get the animation later-on.It would be good to have time stamp on images to get the animation later-on.AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/127BUG: runTimePostProcessing doesn't respect -case argument2016-06-14T07:51:19ZPrashant SonakarBUG: runTimePostProcessing doesn't respect -case argumentThe output is created in ./postProcessing/...
than $FOAM_CASE/postProcessing/...The output is created in ./postProcessing/...
than $FOAM_CASE/postProcessing/...AdminAdminhttps://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/135wrong category for interDyMFoam/ras tutorials2016-06-14T22:11:01ZMatej Formanwrong category for interDyMFoam/ras tutorialsMinor issue really, but tutorials for interDyMFoam solver:
damBreakWithObstacle
sloshingTank3D6DoF
sloshingTank3D
testTubeMixer
sloshingTank3D3DoF
sloshingTank2D3DoF
sloshingTank2D
are using 'laminar' model of tur...Minor issue really, but tutorials for interDyMFoam solver:
damBreakWithObstacle
sloshingTank3D6DoF
sloshingTank3D
testTubeMixer
sloshingTank3D3DoF
sloshingTank2D3DoF
sloshingTank2D
are using 'laminar' model of turbulence, and are missing fields for turbulent flow run but are located in $FOAM_TUTORIALS/multiphase/interDyMFoam/ras instead of $FOAM_TUTORIALS/multiphase/interDyMFoam/laminarAdminAdmin