objectRegistry can leak memory
As discussed with @Mattijs - since all HashTable operations are visible through objectRegistry, anything that removes entries using the HashTable methods can leak memory if the object is owned by the registry.
As discussed with @Mattijs - since all HashTable operations are visible through objectRegistry, anything that removes entries using the HashTable methods can leak memory if the object is owned by the registry.
No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down this issue into smaller parts.
Link issues together to show that they're related. Learn more.
mentioned in commit 47493f50
@andy - related to EP829 (will speak tomorrow)
odd-looking use of store()
in basicThermo
mentioned in commit 1dea317a
mentioned in commit 91bf6288
Instead of checkOutByName() or equivalent, just corrected the handling of erase()
to ensure that it doesn't leak memory. This provides the same functionality with an existing method name and plugs potential memory leaks.
mentioned in commit cb0a2636
mentioned in issue #613 (closed)