Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. May 22, 2015
  2. May 19, 2015
  3. May 18, 2015
  4. May 17, 2015
  5. May 09, 2015
  6. May 08, 2015
  7. May 04, 2015
  8. May 02, 2015
    • Henry's avatar
      twoPhaseEulerFoam: In the limit of phase-fraction->0 the velocity is... · 24b0f3ad
      Henry authored
      twoPhaseEulerFoam: In the limit of phase-fraction->0 the velocity is calculated from a force balance
      
      Rather than forcing the dispersed-phase velocity -> the continuous-phase
      velocity as the phase-fraction -> 0 the velocity is now calculated from
      a balance of pressure, buoyancy and drag forces.  The advantage is now
      liquid or particles are not carried out of bubble-column of
      fluidised-beds by the fictitious drag caused by forcing the
      phase-velocities becoming equal in the limit.
      24b0f3ad
  9. Apr 30, 2015
  10. Apr 29, 2015
  11. Apr 28, 2015
  12. Apr 27, 2015
    • Henry's avatar
      twoPhaseEulerFoam: Added experimental face-based momentum equation formulation · fc6b44ee
      Henry authored
      This formulation provides C-grid like pressure-flux staggering on an
      unstructured mesh which is hugely beneficial for Euler-Euler multiphase
      equations as it allows for all forces to be treated in a consistent
      manner on the cell-faces which provides better balance, stability and
      accuracy.  However, to achieve face-force consistency the momentum
      transport terms must be interpolated to the faces reducing accuracy of
      this part of the system but this is offset by the increase in accuracy
      of the force-balance.
      
      Currently it is not clear if this face-based momentum equation
      formulation is preferable for all Euler-Euler simulations so I have
      included it on a switch to allow evaluation and comparison with the
      previous cell-based formulation.  To try the new algorithm simply switch
      it on, e.g.:
      
      PIMPLE
      {
          nOuterCorrectors 3;
          nCorrectors      1;
          nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0;
          faceMomentum     yes;
      }
      
      It is proving particularly good for bubbly flows, eliminating the
      staggering patterns often seen in the air velocity field with the
      previous algorithm, removing other spurious numerical artifacts in the
      velocity fields and improving stability and allowing larger time-steps
      For particle-gas flows the advantage is noticeable but not nearly as
      pronounced as in the bubbly flow cases.
      
      Please test the new algorithm on your cases and provide feedback.
      
      Henry G. Weller
      CFD Direct
      fc6b44ee
  13. Apr 25, 2015
  14. Apr 24, 2015
  15. Apr 21, 2015
  16. Apr 20, 2015
  17. Apr 18, 2015
  18. Apr 12, 2015
  19. Apr 11, 2015
  20. Apr 10, 2015
  21. Apr 08, 2015