GitLab now enforces expiry dates on tokens that originally had no set expiration date. Those tokens were given an expiration date of one year later. Please review your personal access tokens, project access tokens, and group access tokens to ensure you are aware of upcoming expirations. Administrators of GitLab can find more information on how to identify and mitigate interruption in our documentation.
ENH: Robust Iterative Eigendecomposition and Parallel Low-Memory Dynamic Mode Decomposition
New robust solver/container: Iterative eigendecomposition:
The new iterative eigen decomposition functionality is derived from: Passalacqua et al.'s OpenQBMM (openqbmm.org/), which is mostly derived from JAMA (math.nist.gov/javanumerics/jama/).
New field function object: Parallel low-memory dynamic mode decomposition:
STDMD (i.e. Streaming Total Dynamic Mode Decomposition) is a variant ofa data-driven dimensionality reduction method.STDMD is being used as a mathematical post-processing tool to computea set of dominant modes out of a given flow (or dataset) each of which isassociated with a constant frequency and decay rate, so that dynamicfeatures of a given flow may become interpretable, and tractable.Among other Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) variants, STDMD is presumedto provide the general DMD method capabilities alongside economised andfeasible memory and CPU usage.STDMD and mode-sorting algorithms (tags:K, HRDC, KZ, HWR): Kiewat, M. (2019). Streaming modal decomposition approaches for vehicle aerodynamics. PhD thesis. Munich: Technical University of Munich. URL:mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1482652/1482652.pdf Hemati, M. S., Rowley, C. W., Deem, E. A., & Cattafesta, L. N. (2017). De-biasing the dynamic mode decomposition for applied Koopman spectral analysis of noisy datasets. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 31(4), 349-368. DOI:10.1007/s00162-017-0432-2 Kou, J., & Zhang, W. (2017). An improved criterion to select dominant modes from dynamic mode decomposition. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 62, 109-129. DOI:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2016.11.015 Hemati, M. S., Williams, M. O., & Rowley, C. W. (2014). Dynamic mode decomposition for large and streaming datasets. Physics of Fluids, 26(11), 111701. DOI:10.1063/1.4901016Parallel classical Gram-Schmidt process (tag:Ka): Katagiri, T. (2003). Performance evaluation of parallel Gram-Schmidt re-orthogonalization methods. In: Palma J. M. L. M., Sousa A. A., Dongarra J., Hernández V. (eds) High Performance Computing for Computational Science — VECPAR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2565, p. 302-314. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI:10.1007/3-540-36569-9_19Parallel direct tall-skinny QR decomposition (tags:BGD, DGHL): Benson, A. R., Gleich, D. F., & Demmel, J. (2013). Direct QR factorizations for tall-and-skinny matrices in MapReduce architectures. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. DOI:10.1109/bigdata.2013.6691583 Demmel, J., Grigori, L., Hoemmen, M., & Langou, J. (2012). Communication-optimal parallel and sequential QR and LU factorizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 34(1), A206-A239. DOI:10.1137/080731992DMD properties: Brunton S. L. (2018). Dynamic mode decomposition overview. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington. youtu.be/sQvrK8AGCAo (Retrieved:24-04-20)
New extensive, true-false type unit tests for Matrix classes
Resolved bugs (If applicable)
Improved robustness in Moore-Penrose matrix inverse function
Details of new models (If applicable)
A verification example for STDMD: Two-dimensional steady-inflow cylinder test:
STDMD is in its beta phase; therefore, small-to-medium changes in input/output interfaces and internal structures should be expected in the next versions depending on the unknown
Peer-review, or any type of feedback for any part of the code is more than welcomed:
