ensight cloud functionObject
All threads resolved!
All threads resolved!
Additional function-object to generate EnSight output for lagrangian. cross-ref EP2316
Edited by Mark OLESEN
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
assigned to @andy
- Resolved by Mark OLESEN
- I think it looks reasonably OK, but ParaView still doesn't seem to handle measured data, so might need to use a real Ensight to test.
- It is also possible that we need to have a volume geometry (eg, a bounding box) to properly load. I faintly remember something like this (years ago), but need to verify.
added 17 commits
-
36485031...3a43aae7 - 13 commits from branch
develop
- 6dadd3d3 - ENH: include cloudFunction results in vtkCloud writing (#3094 (closed))
- 86c9bbb5 - ENH: add ensight write-box method (eg, for simple 'placeholder' geometry)
- 2f939b87 - ENH: extend ensightCloud write-measured support
- e3aef5ea - ENH: additional ensightCloud function object (#3095 (closed))
Toggle commit list-
36485031...3a43aae7 - 13 commits from branch
Hi @Prashant - updated to include a bound-box geometry for the functionObject output.
I would tend to treat the case offoamToEnsight -latestTime -no-internal -no-boundary
as a special case, where the user probably knows what they are doing (I guess).EDIT: now handling this case too.
Edited by Mark OLESENadded 4 commits
- 4ae4f092 - ENH: ensightFile writeInt() method to replace two-parameter write
- cb416fb3 - ENH: add ensight writeBox method (eg, for simple 'placeholder' geometry)
- fe1d7e01 - ENH: extend ensightCloud write-measured support
- 52f5a6d0 - ENH: additional ensightCloud function object (#3095 (closed))
Toggle commit listmentioned in commit 19a6241e
Please register or sign in to reply