"README.md" did not exist on "b299bad95ce8ee19033f408f722ccec4424a6ee8"
ENH: turbulentDFSEMInlet: various improvements
Summary
- ENH: Input entries of
R
,L
andU
are nowPatchFunction1
type. - ENH: Adds two scalar normalisation factors for input
R
,L
andU
:Uref
andLref
(default=1). - ENH: Adds a scalar factor to enable users to tune the C1 normalisation coefficient:
scale
(default=1). - BUG: MappedFile: separates scopes of entries.
- TUT: Replaces
chan395DFSEM
andPCF
tutorials withplaneChannel
andoneCellThickPlaneChannel
tutorials.- Corrects the integral-length scale input files.
- Updates the Extended Code Guide's channel flow case, and allows users to reproduce the results.
Resolved bugs (If applicable)
#2098 (closed) #2097 (closed) #2090 #1004 #1744 #2089 (closed)
Details of new models (If applicable)
A set of results obtained from the planeChannel
tutorial (and its plot script available to users) with a different set of settings can be seen below:
Ruv vs y
u vs y
Ruu vs y
x vs Cf
Rvv vs y
Rww vs y
Risks
User input
Users (my apologies) will have to change the input syntax for R
, L
and U
entries. For example, for reading the input files in constant/boundaryData/inlet/0/
, users were using the following minimal syntax:
inlet
{
type turbulentDFSEMInlet;
delta 1;
mapMethod nearestCell;
value $internalField;
}
For the same effect, one of the syntax examples could be as follows:
inlet
{
type turbulentDFSEMInlet;
delta 1;
U mappedFile;
R mappedFile;
L mappedFile;
mapMethod nearest;
value $internalField;
}
or as follows:
inlet
{
type turbulentDFSEMInlet;
delta 1;
U
{
type mappedFile;
mapMethod nearest;
}
R
{
type mappedFile;
mapMethod nearest;
}
L
{
type mappedFile;
mapMethod nearest;
}
value $internalField;
}
Users can, however, use any of the PatchFunction1
input syntax exemplified in this link and this link.
Regressions
The default value ofnCellPerEddy
entry was changed from 5 to 1, which is the default value corresponding to the original journal paper.- The default value of
nCellPerEddy
entry was kept the same as 5.
Remaining issues
- Arguably, the DFSEM method has various theoretical issues that need to be addressed (see #2090). We have been trying to reach the originators of the method during the last couple of years; and we will continue our efforts, if possible, to cooperate with them to resolve some of these issues.
Edited by Kutalmış Berçin
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
Please register or sign in to reply